Why Self-Publishing Is a Tragic Term

The Birds Tree by ploop26 / DeviantArt

The Birds Tree by ploop26 / DeviantArt

Today’s guest post is by Ed Cyzewski. You may recall him from his previous post here, When Self-Publishing Is More Useful as a Marketing Tool.


My friend Shawn recently released a book that shares his journey into full-time writing. It involves a failed small business, $50,000 in debt, a difficult return to his parents’ basement, and a plan to rebuild his life through writing. It’s a unique, inspiring story, but that’s not what really caught my attention about his book.

Shawn invited nine colleagues to share their own stories about writing full time. I shared how I advertise my freelance blogging and editing services. I’m sure there are plenty of books out there that include short stories and case studies, but Shawn actually wove each contributor’s essay into his own story, explaining how each of us provided ideas for his work.

Technically speaking, Shawn self-published this book. However, his community-based approach provides lessons for both commercial publishing and self-publishing.

Self-Publishing Doesn’t Have to Be Lonely

Writers are already cooped up in corners of their bedrooms or in back corners of cafes. Must the publishing process add another layer of isolation?

Many authors have wisely moved away from the term “self-publishing.” I’ve seen words like “independent” or “indie” publishing tossed around. They help characterize this kind of publishing as an independent business model, not necessarily a solitary pursuit. The very use of the word “self” belies a tragic individualism and reliance on “self” in publishing today. To speak of “self-publishing” is a linguistic mistake that could hint that publishing is all up to you.

There’s No Such Thing as Self-Marketing

I am one of many nonfiction authors whose nose has been rubbed in the word “platform” long enough to realize that I can’t sell books on my own. Nonfiction authors especially need tribes, subscribers, followers, friends, pins, backers, and enough Facebook shares to convince hipsters that your writing is “so over.”

People have to decide that our work is valuable and share it, buy it, or preferably do both.

Shawn didn’t just build a community in order to market his book. He built a community around creating a book—including the writing and cover design. When it came time to promote his project, he had a community of writers who were eager to share his creation because we all shared a part in it.

Is Community Publishing for You?

Shawn’s book is one of many projects that have prompted me to rethink my future publishing plans. While I’m already pitching several book projects with a variety of co-authors, I’m beginning to explore what “community publishing” could look like.

I’ve already worked hard to build a community of writing colleagues through blogs, social media, and writing conferences, and now I’m trying to match these colleagues with my own community publishing projects. One particular proposal involves a series of essays about leaving and returning to the church. My own story creates the framework for the book, but brief essays by my colleagues add depth and insight that I could never offer on my own.

I’m still hoping to publish these community projects commercially, but the thought of self-publishing them isn’t quite so daunting since I wouldn’t be on my own throughout the publishing process.

The word self-publishing tells a lie of sorts—at least, it’s a lie for most of us. It hints that you can publish a book successfully on your own. For most of us, that simply isn’t true. For the great majority of us, self-publishing a book on our own will also be lonely and unpleasant.

I’ve seen authors and publishers produce incredible books with community-driven models. While I’ll still pitch some projects that are solely my own, my long-term publishing plans revolve around sharing my work with a community of writers and rising together.

If community publishing strikes you as too intimidating, keep in mind that many bloggers already know how community publishing works. Bloggers who host guest posts make community publishing work. In fact, many of the most popular blogs accept guest posts.

Perhaps community publishing is a passing fad, but I’m betting that it provides an ideal way forward for writers who are tired of staring at the wall in a café. If it flops, at least I’ll have a few friends willing to buy me a cup of tea so we can talk about our next project.


Upcoming Online Classes

Posted in Getting Published, Marketing & Promotion.
Ed Cyzewski

Ed Cyzewski

Ed Cyzewski writes and edits books in Columbus, Ohio, and is the author of Pray, Write, Grow, A Christian Survival Guide, and Write without Crushing Your Soul, among other books. You can find him at www.edcyzewski.com and on Twitter and Facebook.

Join the conversation

30 Comments on "Why Self-Publishing Is a Tragic Term"

Notify of
avatar

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
L'Aussie Denise
L'Aussie Denise
4 years 1 month ago

This was interesting Ed. My Writing Group is collaborating on an epic fantasy novel. It is wonderful world building together and tossing about ideas for plot and character. Gets you out of the study! I love the community concept.

Denise

San0670
San0670
4 years 1 month ago

Community publishing is a good idea except when you decide to commercialize; some publishers don’t like work with multiple authors but if you decide to self-publish it may be okay. As for the term self-publishing, it depends on how one defines it including the author’s participation in the publishing process. For example, there must be another name to call when the author pays for the publishing, rather than have the publisher pay for the entire process. Sorry for typo error if any I’m having problem typing a response, hope the author is aware.

Jim Hamlett
4 years 1 month ago
Ed, You touched a nerve. I applaud Shawn (and his friends). I’m one of those “technically” self-published authors. After tiring of the publishing game, I jumped to my long-term plan of forming a fellowship of writers who would write mainly fiction from a Christian worldview. Literature grade, hopefully, stories that are entertaining, engaging, and with a well-defined theme without being in your face with a message. I formed one of those “indie” publishing houses (Graceful Word) that lives on a shoestring budget. I’m the only writer at present. After I get established with my first novel, I’ll be in the… Read more »
Shawn Smucker
Shawn Smucker
4 years 1 month ago

Thanks for the shout-out Ed. I was honored to have you contribute to the book. It is indeed a new and exciting time in publishing, and I’m eager to see the direction your new projects take.

shirleyhs
4 years 1 month ago

I’m excited about so many things in this post. I love the idea of community publishing — and the idea of the returning to church with new purpose and vision. I also am one of Shawn Smucker’s fans and hope to do a guest post here for Jane’s blog later this summer. You provide an excellent model. Thanks!

Cathy Day
Cathy Day
4 years 1 month ago
I’ve also noticed the word “indie” used to describe self-publishing, such as this headline about ON THE ISLAND in digitalbookworld: “Indie Author Inks Seven-Figure Deal with Penguin after Shooting up E-book Bestseller List.” But I think of indie lit the same way I think about indie film: the content, style, aesthetic vision is less commercial, more “artistic.” This doesn’t describe ON THE ISLAND, which is a quite well-written romance novel. The “community” model you advocate for here has been happening for quite some time in what I’ve come to know as the “indie lit world,” which is thriving in the… Read more »
Terri Sonoda
4 years 1 month ago
I just had my first fiction novel published, but didn’t do the publishing myself. I relied on a small Indie publishing company, which meant I was willing to share the small earnings with them in exchange for their tending to the business side. It’s not that I couldn’t do it myself; I’d just rather write and not bother with the business side. I do, however, get quite involved with the marketing/advertising side of things, as I really have no choice. As for community writing, I’m the opposite of most. I’d rather do my own writing in my lonely corner. Maybe… Read more »
Jennifer Luitwieler
4 years 1 month ago

Ed, I really like the way you take these laden words and turn them on their heads. I pursue community first because it is important to me as a human, second as a writer. The natural byproduct is collaboration (another buzzword), whether we recognize it or not. I have long maintained, just ask Shawn, that just be ause I write in solitude doesn’t mean I write alone.

Shawn Spjut
4 years 1 month ago

Ed. Wonderful share. The older I get, the more convinced I am that life was meant to be pursuied through community and relationships. I am currenlty doing a post series on Personal Branding and during the research I realized that marketing, branding and yes publishing all starts with the community of relationships we intentionally and unintentionally build. Again, thanks for the reminder.

trackback
[…] Today’s guest post is by Ed Cyzewski. You may recall him from his previous post here,When Self-Publishing Is More Useful as a Marketing Tool.   My friend Shawn recently released a book that shares his journey into full-time writing. It involves a failed small business, $50,000 in debt, a difficult return to his parents’ basement, and a plan to rebuild his life through writing. It’s a unique, inspiring story, but that’s not what really caught my attention about his book.   Shawn invited nine colleagues to share their own stories about writing full time. I shared how I advertise my freelance blogging and editing… Read more »
TNeal
4 years 29 days ago
I’ve had the tendency to correct someone who says, “Now you’re published,” by adding “self-published.” Then I attempt to refine that image as well so as to distinguish my book from the tell-all memoir written to let everyone know what Uncle Harry did to me when I was a kid. Ed, the main difference between the publishing road I traveled and the traditional pub trail is who footed the bill. I know there’s more to it than that but, honestly, I didn’t publish at all. I wrote the novel and the check, but a whole lot of other people made… Read more »
Eleanor Sullivan
Eleanor Sullivan
4 years 29 days ago
Interesting post, Ed. I’d never thought of community publishing as you’ve described. I’m published in nonfiction by Prentice Hall, had 3 mysteries published by a small press, and chose to go the indie route with my historical mystery after my agent failed to sell it. My “community” includes my editor, cover designer, book designer, web guru, Facebook guru (a work in progress), and a publicist. I, of course, write the checks. But in the 6 months my book’s been out there, I’ve made more than 5 years with the small press. What’s interesting to me is that few people ask… Read more »
trackback

[…] finally, for the main topics today, Ed Cyzewski (@edcyzewski) discusses his thoughts on Why Self-Publishing Is a Tragic Term on Jane Friedman’s (@JaneFriedman) blog. Hmm. “Tragic” might be a bit of a […]

Turndog Millionaire
4 years 29 days ago

Never thought about it like this, but I like it

Danny Iny is just starting a collaborative project and it has me fascinated. This idea of community publishing is a great idea. The very essence of engaging, which lets face it, is what building a platform is all about

topp post my man

Matthew (Turndog Millionaire)

Michael N. Marcus
4 years 29 days ago
My first book was published by Doubleday in 1977. My second by a tiny publisher about 20 years later. I didn’t like the books or my earnings. In 2008 I formed Silver Sands Books, intending to publish exactly one book. Publishing is addictive, and I’ve published over 20 books so far. At first I called myself a self-publisher, or a self-publishing author, or an independent self-publisher. The term “self-publish” (and its variations) has been taken over by the companies that used to be called vanity presses, subsidy publishers or even author mills — so the label can be fatal. Even… Read more »
Maryann McFadden
4 years 9 days ago
This is a great post, as it touches a nerve so many writers have. Hearing that dreaded question: Is your book self-published? My first novel, THE RICHEST SEASON, was self-published in ’06 and I proved it had an audience and “won the literary lottery,” as writers’ blogs put it. I was thrilled, finally achieving the dream of being with a major publisher. But…oh yes, every good story has that “but”…when it came to my new novel, THE BOOK LOVER, which chronicles the journeys of an aspiring novelist and a struggling bookstore owner, I found myself on a slippery slope. While… Read more »
Brett Henley
4 years 29 days ago

I think you hit the nail. I hope that more writers will embrace community publishing, because it’s absolutely viable if you break it down to its most basic:

You’re building advocacy and support for your work as you write it. You gain trust, authenticity and most importantly, relationships.

I’m on this sort of community publishing journey myself, although I’m more exclusively focused on building a community of readers around the work before it’s published. Slightly different but same result – we’re never alone when we share out stories.

Thanks Ed! (and Jane 😉

Orna Ross
4 years 29 days ago

Thank you Ed, most interesting. I believe this is a new and rich direction for writing and publishing, with exciting prospects. Here’s how an author collective with writers in different parts of Europe (Triskele Books) got together : http://selfpublishingadvice.org/blog/how-author-collectives-boost-self-publishing/

Jenny Hansen
4 years 28 days ago

Ed, I’m a huge fan of the WANA principle (We Are Not Alone) coined by Kristen Lamb. The community approach works. 🙂

trackback
Friday Features #11 | Yesenia Vargas
4 years 27 days ago

[…] Why Self-Publishing is a Tragic Term by Ed Cyzewski at Jane Friedman […]

Linton Robinson
Linton Robinson
4 years 25 days ago

Loo9k up “belies”

This is silly. “Self publishing” means you published the book on your your own instead of somebody else contracting to publish it.
Kind of like “do it yourself” home remodel or anything. Doesn’t mean you have to go into a monastary. Just means you’re the independent contraor.

JonathanCGillespie
JonathanCGillespie
4 years 25 days ago

Solid article. Team building is very important, particularly in “independent” publishing, and the author definitely hits the nail on the head here with a reminder on that point. If I may, allow me to share a recent blog post of my own on the subject: http://budurl.com/v647 Thanks!

trackback

[…] Why Self-Publishing Is a Tragic Term […]

trackback

[…] Why Self-Publishing is a Tragic Term – a thoughty post on Jane Friedman’s blog […]

trackback

[…] Ed Cyzewski brings up a good point. I hadn’t thought about it before, but it makes a lot of sense. These days, does Self-Publishing actually exist? How many people acreate a book on their own? […]

trackback

[…] post is by Ed Cyzewski (@EdCyzewski). You may remember him from a previous guest post at this site, Why Self-Publishing Is a Tragic Term. Ed’s latest e-book is available as a free download on Tuesday & Wednesday of this […]

wpDiscuz