10 Phrases to Purge From Your Speech & Writing

Word Savvy

The following is excerpted from Word Savvy by Nancy Ragno, recently released by Writer’s Digest Books.


The following mistakes occur so often that they have come to sound and look correct. Undoubtedly, you will recognize some entries as known errors, but others may give you pause: “Is that an error? I didn’t realize that.”

Since the list is a manageable size, a brief scan will quickly tell you what you need to learn. Show your superior word savvy. Purge the following offenders from your speech and your writing.

1. Alot

Not a word. Instead, use two separate words: a lot. A lot means “a large number or amount; to a great degree or extent.”

2. Alright

Not a word. Write it as two words: all right. Because all right is commonly spoken as one word, it is mistakenly written that way. All right means “very well, okay, without a doubt.”

CORRECT: After the storm, we checked the property to make sure everything was all right.

3. By the power invested in me

The correct phrase is by the power vested in me. Invested usually refers to financial transactions. Vested means “bestowed on; conferred on.”

INCORRECT: By the power invested in me by the State of New Jersey …

CORRECT: By the power vested in me by the State of New Jersey …

4. Could care less

The correct phrase is could not care less or couldn’t care less.

INCORRECT: I could care less about ice hockey.

This is illogical. It means that the speaker cares about ice hockey but possibly could care less about it.

CORRECT: I am not at all interested in ice hockey and couldn’t care less about it.

5. Could of

The correct expression is could have.

INCORRECT: I could of danced all night!

CORRECT: I could have danced all night.

6. Final ultimatum

This phrase is redundant since ultimatum encompasses the meaning “final.” Use ultimatum by itself, without a modifier. Ultimatum means “a final statement of terms; one’s last word on a subject.”

7. For all intensive purposes

The correct phrase is for all intents and purposes. It means “for all practical purposes; in effect.”

CORRECT: These unsold items from our garage sale are, for all intents and purposes, useless.

8. Heart-wrenching

Not a word. It may have originated by mistakenly connecting it to the similar word gut-wrenching. The correct word is heartrending. Heartrending means “inciting anguish, arousing deep sympathy; extremely moving.”

CORRECT: The Derby opened with a heartrending rendition of “My Old Kentucky Home.”

9. Hone in on

The correct phrase is home in on. It means “to aim at a target” (as a homing pigeon aims at its home). In contrast, to hone means “to sharpen” (as you would hone a blade to sharpen it).

CORRECT: Police are homing in on the robbery suspect.

10. Irregardless

Not a standard word. Instead, use regardless. Regardless means “in spite of; without regard for.”

CORRECT: I must have that ring regardless of its cost.


Nancy RagnoInterested in finding out more? Word Savvy offers 15 additional no-no’s, as well as how to master the 76 commonly confused word pairs, and conquer the 52 commonly misused words. Click here to find out more on Amazon, or visit the website dedicated to the book. Author Nancy Ragno earned her master’s at New York University and is a former teacher, lecturer, and textbook author.

  • http://sophiathewriter.blogspot.com Sophia Chang

    I’m on board! I’ve coined many a slang term during college that still gets thrown around by old colleagues!

  • http://twitter.com/AmyDenim Amy Denim

    Can we please add the misuse of ‘literally’ to this list.  It figuratively blows the top off my head when people say something was done literally, even when using it as hyperbole.

  • Erica

    I appreciate your list.  May I suggest that the word hopefully is also used when often what people mean is (I am hopeful that I will get the job or whatever but not hopefully).  Thanks.

  • Patricia Gligor

    “Word Savvy” is a great idea for a book. I laughed when I read most of the examples that Nancy listed but had to stop to think for a second about some of the others.

  • Forliz

    Might I could care less not convey sarcasm?

  • Cwparis7

    NO shortage of linguistic pet peeves in my corner. Like “step foot” into something instead of “set foot.”  An albatross around someone’s neck so I  guess no one is getting off the ground. The word is millstone.  Then there’s “hesitancy” instead of “hesitation,”  “relevancy” instead of “relevance” and “competency” instead of “competence.”  Nouns used as verbs? Impact, advantage……  Do not get me on that soapbox! 

  • Mary

    How about “Alls”?  Well educated folk use this instead of “all”!  Alls I want is my share.  

    All I want is my share.

  • Lovespoet

    Alright is still correct in Microsoft Word

  • http://www.thegoodeditor.com Laura Kenney

    My father always helped me (and his students) remember this one by asking us to say to ourselves, “It’s either all right or all wrong.”  You wouldn’t say “alwrong,” right?

  • http://www.thegoodeditor.com Laura Kenney

    Hi, Emma. While using “myriad” on its own reads and sounds better, “a myriad of” is grammatically correct. Do you stop reading because you don’t like the word or the usage? Just curious! 

  • http://www.thegoodeditor.com Laura Kenney

    Great list!  Thanks for posting on FB, Emma! Regarding “final ultimatum,” I’ve always felt that way about “final destination”–Am I getting too picky?

  • Ellen K.

    I notice the headline doesn’t match the content.  In particular, the first, second, and fifth are all issues of spelling and not at all things the author is suggesting we purge from our speech.  Okay, number 5 is debatable on the author’s intent, but the first two are very clearly spelling issues only.

  • Ellen K.

    If there’s a difference between “alwrong” and “all wrong” in speech, I don’t see it.  Spaces between words are a writing things, not something that exists in anything we say.

  • http://www.thegoodeditor.com Laura Kenney

    You are absolutely all right ;)

  • http://www.thegoodeditor.com Laura Kenney

    Well, the headline does say speech and writing.

  • Pingback: 10 “No-No’s” to Purge From Your Speech & Writing | The Word Savvy Site

  • Solar Fuel

    “Hone in” is just not a natural construction, any more than “sharpen in” is. It is obviously an eggcorn for the original “home in”.

  • http://heatherharshman.wordpress.com/ Heather Harshman

     Merriam-Webster is always updating terms as new ones are created. We should petition to have heart-wrenching added!

  • Pingback: Link dump » fritz freiheit.com blog

  • Pingback: Link dump » fritz freiheit.com blog