Two Court Rulings on AI: Neither Gives Authors What They Want, But There’s Still a Long Road Ahead

While the same issue lies at the heart of both cases and both judges found in favor of AI companies, the rulings are quite different from one another.


This premium article is available to paid subscribers of Jane's newsletter. Here's what subscribers get:

  • Publishing industry news that includes Jane’s reporting and analysis (weekly)
  • Access to more than 3,000 premium articles on this site, all searchable
  • Access to Jane’s private resource guides, continually updated

Subscribe today.

Or login below if you're already a subscriber.

Wondering why some content isn't free? Did something change? Here's an explanation.

1 Comment
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
D.L. Lee

Good interview. It’s interesting that the judges have a hard time assessing potential market harm while acknowledging that no human comparison to AI exists, in terms of capacity to produce competitive product—their dilemma makes me wonder if a private concern is that the horse is out of the barn. Time will tell. Thanks Jane.