Judge finds that Tracy Wolff did not plagiarize Crave series

In late 2024, I ran a long analysis of the Crave series copyright case brought by author Lynne Freeman in 2022 against author Tracy Wolff as well as her publisher, Entangled; literary agent Emily Sylvan Kim; and others. Freeman alleges that the series bears “overwhelming and undeniable” similarities to her unpublished work, which was submitted to agent Emily Sylvan Kim; Kim also represents Tracy Wolff.

Earlier this week, the judge in the case ruled that Tracy Wolff did not plagiarize; to reach this conclusion, the judge read six drafts of Freeman’s work and the four Crave novels, or about 6,000 pages of romantasy fiction over eight weeks. (Copyeditor comments, “Please say the judge received hazard pay.”) In the end, as one New Yorker reporter concluded on her own, after very thorough reporting in 2025, the stories simply share a lot of common fantasy tropes, and that’s not against the law. Read the judgment.