Grammarly uses identities of authors, journalists, and editors without permission

Grammarly, the popular editing service, has integrated an “Expert Review” feature that offers advice attributed to countless well-known personalities in media and publishing. No permission has been granted by these experts for such use. In a statement to The Verge, a representative from the company said, “The Expert Review agent doesn’t claim endorsement or direct participation from those experts; it provides suggestions inspired by works of experts and points users toward influential voices whose scholarship they can then explore more deeply.” Read Stevie Bonifield at The Verge.

Casey Newton is one of the writers who didn’t offer permission for his name or likeness to be turned into a Grammarly feature. He has opted out and shares an email address that anyone can use to opt out. I did so immediately. Learn more.

While I’m not a lawyer, this looks like a potential violation of right of publicity, a law that varies by state. Because this problem affected me in 2023—and I anticipated it would only get worse—I trademarked my name in 2024. That means if Grammarly uses my name, I could have a case under the Lanham Act, the primary federal trademark law in the US. Learn more about the process of obtaining a trademark.

Screenshot of Grammarly’s expert review, shared on Bluesky by author and editor Benjamin Dreyer. Expert reviews are offered by Stephen King, Ann Handley, Joe Pulizzi, Mary Norris, and Benjamin Dreyer, all well-known names in the publishing and media business.
Screenshot of Grammarly’s expert review, shared on Bluesky by author and editor Benjamin Dreyer. Expert reviews referenced in this screenshot: Stephen King, Ann Handley, Joe Pulizzi, Mary Norris, and Benjamin Dreyer, all well-known names in the publishing and media business.

Update

Within hours of this article’s publcation, Grammarly pulled down the feature and was also sued. Read the New York Times op-ed (gift link) by the person suing.