Defendants in the Crave copyright case demand that their collective $3.4 million in legal fees be covered

In March, a US federal court ruled that Tracy Wolff’s Crave series did not plagiarize or infringe on Lynne Freeman’s work. Rather, the two stories simply share a lot of common fantasy tropes, and that’s not against the law. Read the judgment.

Now, the defendants, which include the publisher Entangled and agent Emily Sylvan Kim, are suing Freeman to cover their legal fees, which total more than $3.4 million. (Entangled spent the most on defense, about $2.7 million.) US copyright law allows for the prevailing party to recover legal fees, although it’s discretionary and not automatic. Learn more.

To explore even further: In late 2024, I ran a long analysis of the Crave series copyright case.