New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft

This New York Times lawsuit was largely expected after licensing talks broke down with OpenAI last year. The complaint accuses OpenAI and Microsoft of copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, violation of the DMCA, unfair competition, and trademark dilution.

The complaint states, “For months, The Times has attempted to reach a negotiated agreement with Defendants, in accordance with its history of working productively with large technology platforms to permit the use of its content in new digital products (including the news products developed by Google, Meta, and Apple). The Times’s goal during these negotiations was to ensure it received fair value for the use of its content, facilitate the continuation of a healthy news ecosystem, and help develop GenAI technology in a responsible way that benefits society and supports a well-informed public. These negotiations have not led to a resolution.”

The filing is worth a browse, since it offers screenshot comparisons of New York Times content next to AI-generated content, as seen below. However, the New York Times did have to engage in extensive and specific prompting to produce these results. TechDirt, while entirely dismissive of the New York Times in its analysis (which matches its long-standing dismissive approach to copyright protection), does make some good points about why this is not quite as bad as it looks.

Screenshot from the legal complaint files by the New York Times, showing two columns of text: on the right is text from a New York Times article of original reporting about the city’s taxicab business, and on the left is output from GPT-4 when prompted to provide information about that same topic. Text in red indicates where GPT has regurgitated sentences verbatim from the Times article, and nearly the entirety of GPT-4’s output is red.