Trademark Is Not a Verb: Guidelines From a Trademark Lawyer

Trademark symbol

Today’s guest post is from lawyer Brad Frazer. He has also written two other posts for this blog: Copyright Is Not a Verb and Is It Fair Use? 7 Questions to Ask Before Using Copyrighted Material.


I bet I get one call or e-mail per day from someone wishing  to “trademark” something.  “Hey, Brad,” they will say, “I want to trademark my new logo. Can you help me with that?”

As has become my new mantra, I explain to them that trademark is not a verb. It is a noun. Depending on my mood, I will sometimes then go on to discuss common-law trademarks versus trademark registration, and the “Circle R” symbol versus the small superscript “TM.”

The true nature of trademarks is, admittedly, confusing, especially when they are so often confused with copyrights and patents—two completely different forms of intellectual property protection.

In a broad sense, “intellectual property,” as contrasted with real property (dirt) and personal property (cars and computers), has four main subgroups:

  1. Patents. Protects inventions and processes.
  2. Copyrights. Protects things such as books, movies, and photographs.
  3. Trade secrets. A secret device or technique used by a company in manufacturing its products.
  4. Trademarks. A broad category of intellectual property that performs a commercial identification function—they tell you about the source of the good or service you are consuming. You know that a Big Mac hamburger comes from McDonald’s, that a shoe with a swoosh on it comes from Nike, and that insurance being sold by a gecko comes from GEICO.

When I finished the first draft of my novel The Cure, I asked a beta reader to look it over. Her reaction was favorable, but I remember her asking me why there were so many trademarks in it. Her point was that I, as a trademark lawyer, had gone overboard taking care to identify goods and services referenced in the book by their trademark: one character sported a Rolex®-brand watch, another wore Gucci® shoes. I put the circle R symbols right there in the manuscript.

(By the way, circle R is used with trademarks that have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. TM is for those that have not.)

Those symbols and most of the trademarks were all removed in subsequent revisions of my now-published novel, but the point stuck with me. There is a feeling that one must somehow obtain permission, genuflect or pay money or something when one uses a third-party trademark in a manuscript.

For example, assume that you wrote this sentence: “Marjorie picked up her Marlboros® and slid one from the pack, then flicked her Bic® lighter and inhaled, silently thanking Blue Cross® for her excellent health insurance.”

Stylistic conventions aside, do you need permission from Marlboro, Bic and Blue Cross to use their trademarks in this manner? Must you use the “Circle R” symbol, or risk getting sued?

The answer in both cases is, as a general rule, no. The only time a third-party can force you to use the Circle R or TM symbols is if you have a contract of some kind with them that compels you to do so. Trademarks are a form of commercial identification and only gain life and viability when used in a commercial context to sell goods or services. (Now if we change the hypothetical and assume that the prose you wrote is part of a short story being used to sell Zippo lighters, then Bic might arguably have an objection!)

Same thing with band names (as opposed to “brand” names). A band name, e.g., “ZZ Top,” can function as a trademark, but as a general rule, you may use the name of a band in a manuscript as long as it is in a noncommercial context. Sometimes a client will ask if the fact they are selling the book for money means it is a commercial use, and the answer is no. Trademark law is concerned with the selling of related goods or services using trademarks in manner that will confuse consumers, and contextual use in a manuscript is not serving to sell competing services or goods (outside of our Zippo hypothetical).

But be careful with lyrics—lyrics are protected by copyright law, not trademark law, and so wholesale appropriation of lyrics into a manuscript may get you into hot water for copyright infringement, and the fact you are selling the book for money IS relevant in a copyright context!

Candidly, I have not found that using actual trademarks brings much life or verisimilitude to a manuscript, but if you choose to use them, and if you use them in a manner not designed to sell competing goods or services, neither permission nor marking (the Circle R and TM) should be required.


Upcoming Online Classes

Posted in Writing Advice and tagged , , , .

Brad Frazer

Bradlee Frazer is an author, speaker, blogger and Boise, Idaho native. He loves the blues; Ray Bradbury short stories; and his wife, daughter and dogs. Bradlee’s nonfiction has been published in national legal treatises on matters of Internet and intellectual property law, and he is a frequent speaker on those topics. His works of fiction include the short story “Occam’s Razor,” which was published in an online literary journal, and he has co-authored two screenplays, Dangerous Imagination and Spirit of the Lake. He has written scripts for sketch comedy, radio productions and short films, and in college Bradlee was a film critic who wrote and hosted a weekly half-hour television program called “Premiere!” His first novel, The Cure, was recently published by NYC-based Diversion Books. Click here to find out more. And yes, he has registered his copyright.

Join the conversation

41 Comments on "Trademark Is Not a Verb: Guidelines From a Trademark Lawyer"

Notify of
avatar

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Chihuahua Zero
3 years 10 months ago

This is a subject matter I hadn’t really read about. Would the Coca-Cola recipe be an example of a “trade secret”.

Also, what’s your opinion of books and shows that use fake names for companies and products? For example, the iPear on some Nick shows?

Brad
3 years 10 months ago
Dear Chihuahua Zero, Yes, the formula for CocaCola is a textbook example of a trade secret.  It has value and it is a secret–and they work hard to keep it a secret! The use of fake names like the iPear is subject to the same analysis.  If the person who uses the fake name is trying to sell a related good or service and is using the fake name to try and fool consumers into thinking that the fake “thing” is the real thing, then that might be trademark infringement if the two names were similar. Here, I do not… Read more »
Philip Heckman
Philip Heckman
3 years 10 months ago

Few things are as off-putting in fiction as a circle R or TM. I hope we can do away with this curse. Your post is a big help.

Brad
3 years 10 months ago

Thanks Philip!

Adriana Ryan
3 years 10 months ago

Thank you for this post! I know a number of editors who insist that using a store name or brand name in a manuscript requires special permissions from the company. It’s nice to know that it (usually) isn’t so.

Mary Schiller
Mary Schiller
3 years 10 months ago
This is a subject of much confusion.  I had an editor ask me to remove all references to Starbuck’s and the like in my novel (Ford Explorer, Fiat, etc.), but articles I’ve read said it is perfectly all right to use those.  I even had to remove a reference to “Pocohontas” the Disney movie.  The lyrics issue is even stickier.  How much is too much to use without permission?  If a character quotes a song, is that acceptable?  If they sing along with the radio, several stanzas (which just so happen to express something about him), is that a no-no? … Read more »
Chihuahua Zero
3 years 10 months ago

From what I know, in the case of lines of lyrics, you’ll probably have to get permission.

Even in one book that only used a couple of lines, they credited the song on the copyright page. Look into it.

Brad
3 years 10 months ago

Always better to err on the side of caution. But remember that attribution is not permission.

Brad
3 years 10 months ago
Hi, Mary, See above reply re uber-cautious editors.  As I mentioned, I actually removed most trademarks from my manuscript as well since I found they really did not bring much verisimilitude. I mean, if my character really needed to be in a “Starbucks” to move the plot forward, as opposed to a “coffee shop,” use of the Starbucks mark would likely be permissible, in my opinion. Lyrics are protected by copyright law, and there is no bright line test for how much you can use without it amounting to infringement. Remember that it is the act of duplication of the… Read more »
trackback
Friday Features #9 | Yesenia Vargas
3 years 10 months ago

[…] Trademark is Not a Verb: Guidelines From a Trademark Lawyer by Brad Frazer at Jane Friedman […]

Maureen Crisp
Maureen Crisp
3 years 10 months ago

and then you can have some fun with the symbols….
Jasper Fforde in his alternative Thursday Next novels has an all powerful global corporation that has trademarked Toast…and other household names so that every utterance in the Novels has to have the symbols attached to it…A not so subtle indication of the power of the bad guy in these novels….

Turndog Millionaire
3 years 10 months ago

This is very interesting. It’s actually on my to do list, to meet up with someone who can offer advice on this. As someone who has just started a new venture, I have a logo, name, free ebooks, etc and I assume I should protect myself in some way.

The issue is , I have no idea!

To say I’m a novice is an understatement. What’s overkill? What’s a must? Certainly something I need to educate myself in 🙂

I love to learn though, so it’s exciting times

Matthew (Turndog Millionaire)

Bradlee Frazer
Bradlee Frazer
3 years 8 months ago

Matthew, happy to talk with you about these issues if you wish!

Eva Sturmer
Eva Sturmer
3 years 10 months ago

Very interesting article. I’m so glad I’ve found it.

What about quotes from movies? Say, one of my characters is a Star Wars fan and quotes things like: “May the force be with you?” I’m guessing I need permission for those as well?

Bradlee Frazer
Bradlee Frazer
3 years 10 months ago

Quotes from movies would be subject to the same rules as lyrics, yes, but if you are quoting only short phrases here and there and not causing your character to recite long a soliloquy of dialogue from a movie, that should not be copyright infringement. See http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ34.pdf.

Bradlee Frazer
Bradlee Frazer
3 years 10 months ago

This is sort of in the same space, legally speaking . . . http://www.tmz.com/2012/06/18/hangover-2-warner-brother-louis-vuitton/

Writer
Writer
3 years 10 months ago

I’m curious as to your opinion when it comes to claims of trademark dilution, as opposed to infringement, when a famous trademark is used in a negative context in fiction. For example, what if a novel is titled “Coca Cola Ruined My Life,” and the story centers around a fictional character’s attempts to get treated for an addiction to Diet Coke.

trackback

[…] Trademark Is Not a Verb […]

trackback

[…] guest post is by copyright lawyer Brad Frazer. You may remember him from his previous post, Trademark Is Not a Verb. “I copyrighted my book by putting © on the bottom of the first […]

trackback

[…] range of copyright issues. He’s written two posts for this blog (Copyright Is Not a Verb and Trademark Is Not a Verb), and today, I’m featuring a range of Q&A sparked by responses and questions to those […]

Denise Silva
3 years 6 months ago

Hi, and if I mention that my character is singing “name of the song” by “name of the artist” without reference to lyrics, is that okay?

Jane Friedman
3 years 6 months ago

Yes.

Post86
Post86
3 years 4 months ago

I want to write a reference book about a dinnerware line that is trademarked. I will not be selling the product, just describing all the different pieces, decals, etc. Kind of on the same level as collector reference books. Will I have a problem with trademark issues?

Jane Friedman
3 years 4 months ago

You’re fine.

John W.
John W.
3 years 6 days ago

Sorry, I’m a little late to your article. Very helpful. But I’m curious about situations like the following:

You start a website called “The Angry Birds Gazette: News and Events for the Game.” You provide news articles about all things related to the game and you accept advertising from game companies selling mobile phone games.

Would this be trademark infringement?

Brad Frazer
2 years 11 months ago

John, it is a close call, but I think this might rise to the level of trademark infringement, yes. “Angry Birds” is a trademark, and you are using it in a commercial context and in a manner such that a consumer might think that your website was affiliated with, or endorsed or sponsored by, the owners of the Angry Birds trademark. That’s different that just using the mark in text, in a noncommercial context.

Brett
Brett
2 years 11 months ago

Hi, I’m an editor at a regional publishing house and I’m baffled about something. We’re producing a book about regional crimes, and we’d like to include a vintage advertisement (Hamm’s Brewery in St. Paul). The ad is public domain, as it dates from 1905. Nonetheless, Hamm’s still exists and the name is trademark. Would including this violate trademark, or am I outhinking myself on this?

Brett
Brett
2 years 11 months ago

And thanks for the article, by the way. Appreciate it a great deal.

Bradlee Frazer
2 years 9 months ago

You are welcome!

Bradlee Frazer
2 years 9 months ago

Assuming that the ad really IS in the public domain (that can be tricky to verify–the old song “Happy Birthday to You” is still under copyright in the U.S.!), you should be OK under copyright law. Under trademark law, using the Hamm’s ad and logo/trademark in a book like this should not rise to the level of trademark infringement either.

CEE
CEE
2 years 9 months ago
I’m the author of a # of poetry chapbooks. I’m currently working on another mms, and due to the (for lack of a better term) “structure” of the material, I’m needing, ideally, to use the name of a video arcade game from the Reagan Years, as a part of the title. Your information above, puts me at my ease, but for one, niggling Q: Since we are speaking of the actual title of the mms…and no publisher has ever changed a one of mine…does the phraseology or syntax, the message seemingly conveyed by the title, matter at all? Since we’re… Read more »
CEE
CEE
2 years 9 months ago
Wow. I’m uncertain, how to be more plain, without more overkill. Especially since I took away a great amount of relief, from your article, itself. Hmm. I guess the first thing I’m taking away from what you’re saying, would be that actual *titles*, are a sort of quantum leap, in terms of being bold with usage? A “thumbnail billboard”, if you will, therefore an advertisement? But, all right…here: One of my previous chaps, is entitled, “I Am Not Sydney Carton”. A 19th Century Dickensian character. Fairly safe. But, what if we changed this, to, say, “I Am Not Donkey Kong”?… Read more »
CEE
CEE
2 years 9 months ago
2nd example, playing off your “Zippo” usage: One writes a sendup of The Marx Brothers, titling it, “Groucho Beso Mucho Zippo”. This immediately calls up in mindseye, the mischievous countenance of Julius Marx in his prime, and such a seminal celeb, apparently loves our friends at Zippo, to pieces! Clearly, this is out of bounds! …but…a title softer and minus open endorsement, such as (sorry about this) “I Am Not Zippo”, or better yet, “I’m *Not ‘Zippo’*!”, the body of work telling a tale of identity confusion among 50’s teen friends. The Groucho example, hawks a product, intended or not.… Read more »
Clanci Novels
Clanci Novels
2 years 6 months ago

Excellent article Brad. You answered all my questions.

Bradlee Frazer
2 years 2 months ago

Thank you!

Leo
Leo
2 years 4 months ago

Hi Brad, when you say that a trademark is not a verb, does that mean that someone can not trademark a book title with a verb in it? For example something like “The Running Wolf” it describes a wolf that is running as it’s title, but lets say someone wanted to trade mark that as a dog food brand.

Bradlee Frazer
2 years 2 months ago

Hi, Leo,

You may certainly obtain trademark rights in a slogan or phrase that contains a verb. “The Running Wolf,” assuming no one else has previously acquired trademark rights in it, would be an excellent trademark for dog food, yes.

Best,
Brad

Bradlee Frazer
2 years 2 months ago
ryan f
ryan f
1 year 6 months ago
hello brad i was wondering is it copyright infringement to mention specific makes and models of vehicles in my fiction novel. i also mention that the main character uses a very specific name and type of gun. Could those companies have copyright protection on t the hose names and sue me. or is it just fair use. i understand most the copyright laws, but some things im not sure about. i know my book is protected by copyright law even if its not registered, but i cant take some one to court for selling copies and expect to win without… Read more »
trackback

[…] not likely to need a trademark. In this third article from trademark attorney Brad Frazer, “Trademark Is Not a Verb,” you’ll see […]

trackback

[…] Guidelines on using trademarks in your work […]

wpDiscuz