This premium article is available to paid subscribers of Jane's newsletter. Here's what subscribers get:
- Publishing industry news that includes Jane’s reporting and analysis (weekly)
- Access to more than 3,000 premium articles on this site, all searchable
- Access to Jane’s private resource guides, continually updated
Or login below if you're already a subscriber.
Wondering why some content isn't free? Did something change? Here's an explanation.
How would an author show they didn’t use AI? Feels a bit like assumed “guilty” or “suspect” at the start
There is no industry-recognized means of proving human authorship. Brian Murray, CEO of Harpercollins, recently said, “This is an industry built on trust and relationships,” he said, “and we need to rely on those qualities” to find a way to ensure books have been written without AI. He doesn’t believe there is a technical solution to finding AI-aided books. He suggested authors may need to keep records of their writing process, but I have yet to find any agent or publisher reviewing such records or knowing how to authenticate them. More: https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/copyright/article/101002-brian-murray-calls-for-industrywide-solutions-to-issues-around-ai-authorship.html
Agents are telling me that they suspect about 50% of their submissions are now heavily AI assisted but few authors disclose such use.