E-Book Statistics For Authors to Watch


By

E-Book Sales 2011

From ebookcomments.blogspot.com

This weekend, I’ll be speaking at the Writer’s Digest Conference about e-publishing. I’m in the process of updating my slides and information about e-book sales—which can be a confusing and murky issue since the reporting of such sales is not as standardized as print book sales (yet).

Meaning: You can not only find various data sets, you can also find many interpretations. Above is a regularly updated graph from a blogger who has been following e-book sales reported by AAP (Association of American Publishers). It’s a good visual of how sales have picked up in recent years. (Click through for more of his graphs.)

When authors ask me about what’s next for the publishing industry, I try to point them to metrics to keep their eye on—since I find it hard to predict what will happen next. In that vein, here are two posts from this past week that nicely complement one another:

  • Top Self-Published Kindle E-Books of 2011: A Report by Piotr Kowalczyk at Teleread. This helpful parsing of Amazon data helps answer questions such as: Is the 99-cent price tag for e-books wearing out? Can we expect more success stories from independent e-book authors? Will self-published e-books continue to expand? Some of the most interesting data here is the number of self-published titles in the Kindle Top 100 bestsellers. In the best months, self-published titles claimed 20-27% of those spots. What authors should keep an eye on (especially those looking to self-publish): Pay attention to the Kindle Top 100 bestsellers and if the share of self-published titles increases. Also keep an eye on what’s being charged for these titles—because the more that indie authors can charge (and the longer bestseller status can be maintained), the more viable the indie route.
  • Finally, keep track of the appearance of self-published e-book authors on traditional bestseller lists. For instance, in USA Today’s 2011 bestseller list, two out of the 100 bestselling titles were self-published e-books. For the New York Times bestseller list, during the whole of 2011, eleven self-published e-book authors made it to the list. As Publishers Lunch noted (sub required), that’s not very many authors considering how widely the self-pub millionaire trend has been trumpeted. Let’s see if the number grows in 2012.

Helpful links

As a side note, while writing this post, it felt antiquated how bestseller lists still segment out sales by edition (hardcover, paperback, mass market, electronic). If these lists are printed to serve and inform readers—and perhaps that’s a huge assumption?—how much does this distinction matter, except to those inside the industry? How much do these distinctions serve to keep the old paradigms in place? (E.g., “hardcovers” are more important or meaningful than “paperbacks”?)

E-Book Publishing 101
90-minute online class; no tech skill required

WD webinar December 2014My latest online class, in partnership with Writer's Digest, focuses on the basics of do-it-yourself ebook publishing. What are the right services for publishing your e-book? What are some of the most effective e-book marketing strategies? Get answers to these questions, plus an unbiased look at the e-book publishing scene, when you should do it, and-if you do-how to be effective in your efforts, without investing more money than you should.

  • http://twitter.com/turndog_million Matthew Turner

    11 in 100 is rather good when you consider how hard it is for a self pub author to get to the masses. And yes, i bet this number grows in 2012. If it could get to 20 then this would be huge for the self pub market, e-readers and e-books, and the book industry in general

    Nice article and good luck with the conference

    Matt (Turndog Millionaire)

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    To be sure, it was 2 bestsellers out of 100 (overall for the year, according to USA Today). If you look at how many self-pub e-book titles hit the New York Times list, it’s 11 over the course of the entire year (out of a much larger pool of titles).

    Either way, though, I agree with you—it’s not something that has happened before at this scale.

  • http://www.HealthAndHomeTopics.com Connie Myres

    This is encouraging news. I like to see authors have more control over their own created content.

  • Bob Mayer

    I’m just not sure bestseller lists are that applicable any more.  Sales figures are much more viable; and in terms of dollars, not copies sold.  I think it’s misleading to say the sale of a .99 eBook is the same as the sale of a $4.99 eBook.  Especially for an indie author.  We’re talking almost a ten times different in royalty rate.  Publishing has always shied away from talking about money (pretty much everyone does) but I think we’re going to have to in order to understand the reality.  I’ll be doing a post after Digital Book World where I’m going to get into the real numbers I had for 2011.  The key for me is not bestseller lists, but broad base and long tail.

  • http://www.masondixonknitting.com/ Ann

    I agree about the configuration of bestseller lists being irrelevant at this point. I’m reading Jennifer Egan right now: on my Kindle, my laptop, my iPhone, and my husband’s iPad when I was in a pinch. Where do you credit that sale? Publishers are living in 1986, while the world of readers has moved ON. A book simply IS.

    And I think 11 out of 100 is astonishing considering the momentum that those self-published authors create without the aid of the massive infrastructure of the big publishers. So cool! 

  • LesCoalson

    love your teaching style; wish I could attend the conference this year, but not to be. Appreciate the overall industry view and updates–have a great conference!

  • Coalsonl

    Major point! Thanks for sharing.

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    Well, the big question is, applicable to … what? If we’re tracking adoption of e-books, I think it’s a nice starting point. If we’re tracking the ability of self-published authors to be successful without a major publisher, no.

    That’s one reason I mention keeping an eye on the Kindle bestseller list, and the price point of titles there. Piotr does a nice job analyzing the price point trend, which, as you point out, is important to indie author careers.

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    Yes! … If you’d like to know, though: when reading Egan in an electronic edition across all those devices, the industry would count that as 1 e-book sale. 

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    Thanks, Les!

  • http://twitter.com/arjunbasu Arjun Basu

    It’s the Wild West. I’m hoping writers and publishers alike have learned something from the music industry. We saw this 10 years ago: everyone, creators and “publishers” alike, lost in the wilderness. I would argue the music industry never figured it out. The creators started touring more and took over distribution, and the superstars stayed within the confines of the publishers and the fall out is still, well, falling out.

  • http://www.inamirrordimly.com Ed_Cyzewski

    Great data and links Jane. Thanks! 

    I have both commercially published and self-published books, and I’ve been playing with various price points for my self-published E-books. I’ve noticed that the $.99 price point certainly moves more books, but that also makes it quite tough to make any decent money. I don’t know how valid this is, but I’ve begun to think of that price point as essentially running an advertisement. If you think of it that way, I’m actually getting paid a small amount of money to promote my work. The key then is to write up my $.99 E-books so that I can call attention to my other books where I can actually make a profit while still providing valuable information. In the midst of my $.99 promotion, I’ve also noticed that the majority of sales, if not all, have come from Kindle owners. I’ll have to keep an eye on this, but as a Nook owner, I’ve begun to wonder whether a KDP Select exclusive promotion would be worth it, especially for the five days I can offer the E-book as a free download and get some serious attention for it. I’m still thinking about that because I think the Nook is a really great E-reader. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Peter-Shapiro/1416034573 Peter Shapiro

    Sales of my novel GHOSTS ON THE RED LINE for Kindle and Nook picked up substantially when I cut the e-book price to $2.99.  By comparison, including Amazon’s current discount, the paperback version is currently priced at just over $11.  Before Christmas when people were buying the paperback as Xmas gifts, there were more paperbacks sold than e-book copies.  Now e-book copies are the top sellers. 

    GHOSTS ON THE RED LINE is self-published so the major challenge for both formats is getting the word out.  Posters advertising the book were placed in Red Line trains during November-December.  Now I’m relying more on Facebook and other social media.  Also according to reviews on Amazon & BN.com and messages that I’ve received, readers like the book and are letting others know about it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Todd-Hudson/588639843 Todd Hudson

    This is very interesting to someone who has not looked at the markets much since I graduated college 21 years ago.  It does appear that self-pub may be (or become) an alternative, which is amazing.  And I agree with your comments on hardcovers vs. paperbacks, etc.; however, from a business standpoint I can see why the publishers (and author, I would think?) would want to get as much return as possible before releasing subsequent versions – like first run movies, ‘bargain’ runs, Blu-Rays, DVDs and then television releases, I suppose.

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    Yes, between 1999-2009, I believe the recording industry lost about 50% of its revenues (approx $14 billion to $7 billion).

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    I’ve heard anecdotes of authors who have been successful focusing on Nook sales rather than Kindle sales, but like you, when I hear requests for content (e.g., my own e-book or blog), it’s always for Kindle, not the Nook.

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    You might also see if GoodReads is a fit for marketing and promoting your book. (Sometimes a conversation is happening there that you don’t even know about!)

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    You raise an issue that is vexing to consumers: release windows to help preserve industry profits. Some studies have shown that sales can be lost if you deny the consumer the format they prefer (contributes to piracy or lost attention).

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    Thanks for reading & commenting!

  • http://www.inamirrordimly.com Ed_Cyzewski

    You must have brought me good luck Jane. 2 Nooks sales just came through. Maybe some Nook fans wanted to help support Nook books? 

    It is interesting to think about specifically targeting Nook owners. That could be interesting, since I think a lot of Nook owners made a pretty conscious choice of the Nook over the Kindle, which is often more of an automatic choice. Hmmm. I’m not sure if there’s anything to that.

  • http://twitter.com/lkblackburne Livia Blackburne

    Jane, I’m having trouble finding the format that sold the most for each book (ebook/print) in the USA today list.   Do you know where it is?

  • http://twitter.com/lkblackburne Livia Blackburne

    Ah, never mind, found it!

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    It IS a little cryptic. For anyone else wondering, look for the E or P before the publisher’s name.

  • http://www.thefutureofpublishing.com/ Thad McIlroy

    The other potentially misleading aspect of USA Today’s otherwise helpful list is explained by the newspaper as “the description of a title and the publisher name refers to the version selling the MOST (emphasis mine) copies in a particular week — hardcover (H), paperback (P) and e-book (E).”

    So sales of 10,000 e-books, combined with 9,999 hardcover and 9,999 paperback would then be reported as an e-book bestseller.

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    Very true & good point.

  • Pingback: CRITICAL LINKING: January 19, 2012 | BOOK RIOT()

  • Julie

    You’re so right about the segmentation. But the ‘best seller’ tag was always notoriously inaccurate wasn’t it? (with only sales from some stores counting) Would so love to see total sales figures for a single title. Then again, I’d love to see bundled editions (ePub, kindle, audio, some hard copy optional) so what do I know? I’m just the customer… ;)

  • ScottTheWriter / Scott Bury

    I think that 2 out of 100 is a significant number, and 11 out of 100 even more so, considering, first, that it is a new phenomenon, and second, the very steep challenge that self-publishers face against the infrastructure and marketing power of the commercial publishing industry.

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    Indeed, “bestseller” is misleading. In terms of bestseller lists, it’s based on velocity (the game of the rabbit). Some books sell steadily, but more slowly, for decades. E.g., The Bible, The Joy of Cooking, What to Expect When You’re Expecting …

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    It is a breakthrough.

  • Amy

    Great post, Jane.  Thx! 

    And yes, I would say that 11 indies out of 100 titles is a truly remarkable start, considering that (as far as I know) the NYTimes is still claiming they don’t include indie titles on their best seller list! 

    Another question to consider…have any traditional publishers produced 11 titles out of the 100? 

    And lastly, if you want to see which indie titles are making the best seller lists on a weekly basis, you can check out “The List Where Indies Count”, IndieReader’s (www.indiereader.com) list of the best selling indie books, which includes which best seller lists (like USA Today and the NYTimes), indie books are being included on. 

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    It’s true that, for a while, the NY Times wouldn’t include self-pub e-books on the bestseller list. Now they do.

    I think the best comparison to draw would be how many of the other titles were produced by Big Six houses? The answer is nearly all of them, since they are responsible for about 80% of what you see on physical bookstore shelves.

  • Amy

    Sorry I wasn’t more clear.  What I meant to ask was, how many of the Big Six houses have 11 titles on the list.  Did Simon & Schuster?  Penguin?

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    I understood your question, but it’s one you’ll have to research yourself, by analyzing all 52 weeks of each category of the NY Times bestseller list! (Not a quick task, since you have to know who owns what imprint.)

    But I think it’s safe to say … yes. E.g., Harpercollins boasted having more than 100 of its titles to hit the list last year.

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman
  • Pingback: Writing on the Ether | Jane Friedman()

  • Pingback: The Turndog Tales – 14/01 – 20/01 « Turndog Millionaire()

  • Pingback: Born Again Books « virtualDavis()

  • Pingback: Blog Treasures 1-21 | Gene Lempp's Blog()

  • Pingback: Blogs for Self-Publishers for January 15 – 21, 2012 — The Book Designer()

  • Pingback: E-Book Statistics For Authors to Watch | Jane Friedman | All Things Bookish | Scoop.it()

  • Pingback: This Week in the Blogs, January 15 – 21, 2012 - How To Be An Author()

  • Pingback: Seven billion and counting « Audrey Kalman()

  • Pingback: Author Marketing: Entice Agents With 3 Sparkling Steps! « Turndog Millionaire()

  • Pingback: Seamlessness « Infopromom()

  • Phyllis Grode

    Jane, Thanks for the great lecture at WDC. I tried to find the link to the lecture you mentioned, but can not.  Can you send me a link? Thanks. pcagrode@gmail.com 

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    Can you remind me of the context? What specifically did I say was at the link?

  • http://twitter.com/sandrabeckwith sandrabeckwith

    I’m interested in learning more about the demographics of the people buying & reading e-books. Can you point me to any info about that?

    Thanks,
    Sandy Beckwith
    http://buildbookbuzz.com

  • http://janefriedman.com Jane Friedman

    This changes so fast, it’s tough to keep up. But here’s the most recent survey:
    http://www.versoadvertising.com/DBWsurvey2012/

    Also check http://digitalbookworld.com

  • Pingback: Wordpreneur Reader 01.27.2012 | Wordpreneur()

  • http://twitter.com/sandrabeckwith sandrabeckwith

    Thanks very much! I really appreciate it.

    Sandy Beckwith
    http://buildbookbuzz.com

  • Anonymous

    Sure etextbook and ebook sales have increased. In fact a fourth of the sales on http://www.AffordTextbooks.com were either rental or digital textbook purchases.
    Thanks to digital content that is making textbooks affordable !

  • Pingback: The Turndog Tales – 14/01 – 20/01 | Strategic Marketing for Writers & Businesses |()

  • Pingback: Author Marketing: Entice Agents With 3 Sparkling Steps! | Strategic Marketing for Writers & Businesses |()

  • Pingback: Writing on the Ether | JaneFriedman.com | PorterAnderson.com()

  • Pingback: Data Driven eBooks | Portable Career Network - Lifestyle Business and Mobile Work()

  • Pingback: Ideas for Writing an Ebook | Wilson's Words and PicturesWilson's Words and Pictures()

  • Pingback: Author Marketing: Entice Agents With 3 Sparkling Steps!()